Tome

Editor's Review

Tome in 2026 explicitly pivoted from generic AI decks to sales narratives — account-specific pitch decks generated from uploaded prospect data, in an interactive format with embedded video, live product demos, and CTA buttons. Reviewers note the repositioning caused some feature churn, so expect a product still settling into its new skin. Pricing: Free (500 AI credits — roughly 10–15 full decks at 30–50 credits per generation action — basic templates, view-only sharing, watermarked exports); Pro $16/user/month (unlimited AI generation, no watermark, brand kit, real-time collaboration, 14-day trial, no card); Enterprise custom (from ~$1,000/month for 20+ seats: SSO, SOC 2, Salesforce/HubSpot/Slack integrations, analytics). No storage, export, or viewer charges — only editor seats are billed. 150+ templates, 8 languages, Web/PDF export — but no native .pptx. Honest limits: the most expensive entry of the AI deck builders (Gamma $10, SlidesAI $10, Beautiful.ai $12); the narrative "tome" flow is narrower than discrete editable slides and needs more curation and trimming; generation runs ~50 seconds for 12 slides (slower than 2Slides' ~25s); no API/MCP access. Who should pay? Sales teams that will actually use the prospect-data-to-pitch pipeline — that's the bet of the pivot. Who shouldn't? Almost everyone else: Gamma ($10/month Plus, more generous 400-credit free tier) is the faster, cheaper AI-native deck builder optimized for scannable slide formats, and the better cost-to-feature ratio for most users. Beautiful.ai ($12/month) is the design-first pick with real .pptx export. Tome's pivot is interesting; Gamma's product is better right now.